Jackie Mason "It’s The Sub-Prime Mortgages Stupid!"

How can we say the economy is bad today? The anti-Bush crowd just hates to admit that our economy is better than ever. With the recent market volatility, they now have there reason that Bush’s economy is in the toilet. Well, its Sub-Prime mortgages stupid, not the economy that’s in trouble.

Now the left tells us, “You see! We told you the economy under Bush stinks”. The recent market volatility is because of these sub-prime mortgages. All the experts say that these mortgages only make up 2% of all the mortgages, and mortgages themselves, only make up 12 % of the economy. Now the democrats are attacking Bush for not doing anything to help people who can’t pay their mortgages. Meanwhile, they’re promising that if they were in power they would bail these people out. To me, it is the height of depravity to prey on dumb people by promising them thing they could never give them. Why is it the government’s job to bail these people out? It all sounds good to say, but when will this country understand, that the government gets its money from the people, including those who can’t pay their mortgages.

Here’s more on the subject…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwQwZucG9yY

Jackie Mason "Catching Technicalities Instead Of Crooks"

Why has legal and law enforcement system in this country, become more obsessed with catching people on technicalities, than catching people who commit actual crimes. Border agents, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Campeon, are sentenced to 12 years and jail, and not only does the drug dealer they shot trying to keep him from coming into this country get immunity from prosecution, he gets brought back to testify against the agents. And on another front, Critics of President Bush want to make absolutely sure, that Bush and the government are doing nothing to violate the civil liberties of terrorists and terror suspects, instead of trying to stop these villains. G-d forbid, we listen on a phone call or two of a terrorist. What the hell is wrong with us?

Look here…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDI68M1L77w

Jackie Mason "At Least With Terrorists… We Know Where We Stand!"

The democrats proved once again, that they want America to lose the war, so that they win the White House in 2008. The Troops to them is merely secondary to this heartless goal. They have a pointless all night pizza party, that solved nothing, and now as they go on vacation, will not give our troops a raise. Who is the enemy in this country? What are the Democrats doing? At least with the terrorists, we know where we stand.

Take a look...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSY9Pv9aS08

Jackie Mason “Oh… Pardon Me Mr. Clinton”

Clinton’s Criticism of Bush, commuting the sentence of “Scooter” Libby.

Bill Clinton, who essentially committed the same crime as Scooter Libby, but served no Jail time, criticizes Bush for commuting Libby’s Sentence. This same man who has commuted and pardoned outright 4 times as many people as Bush, many involving Clinton campaign contributions or payoff to Hillary’s brothers, is now saying that Bush is ignoring the law!

Take a look…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfppBV-0xas

Democrats: Soiled Diapers And A Spoiled Majority

Like a baby's dirty diaper, hypocrisy and duplicity soils the Democratic majority in Congress, and like the diaper, the closer you get to it, the worse it smells.
In the vote on the non-binding resolution to oppose President Bush's request for a troop surge in Iraq, the overwhelming majority of the Democrats — both in the House and the Senate — voted time after time to fund the war in Iraq. Imagine if you opened a restaurant and had the group of financial backers who enabled you to open the restaurant blame you for opening the business in the first place! Or imagine if someone bought the gas for your car and then they blamed you for trying to drive someplace in the car! The Democrats were Bush's partners in this war from the very beginning, and yet now blame him for the results of the war. Why doesn't Bush blame them for funding the war?
So now, they had their chance to put the final nail in the war’s coffin, and what did they do? They loaded the bill with pork and set an expiration date on the war. Knowing full well that the bill would be “Dead on Arrival” on the Presidents desk. The extra pork alone is proof positive, of their duplicitous nature. Secure their success in the next election, while pretending to be for the troops.
As for the Pull-out date, even they knew this would be outright treasonous, giving our enemies a strategic advantage of holding out until “such and such” date. Then, Harry Reed’s prophecy of us losing the war would be self fulfilled.
So after the House passed the last funding bill with no Pull-out date, why then did they draft the bill in the first place? Why do they howl all day about how we need to end the war, and bring our troops home?
The Democrats have no conscience or moral purpose whatsoever. They are worse than mere hypocrites. They are accessories to the murder of American troops. By not approving of a mission that they have funded all along, they are revealed for what they really are — a group of cowards whose actions are demoralizing the troops and encouraging our enemies to kill more American soldiers. The fact that they are harming our troops' morale by playing into the hands of the enemy means nothing to these Democrats. The Democrats simply don't have the guts to vote to cut off the funding for the war, so they came up with this absurd resolution simply to humiliate George Bush.
It is as if someone wants to kill himself and a fellow on the other side of town pays for the gun and the bullets — and they he says it's someone else's fault the guy committed suicide.
The Democrats are more concerned with their political futures than anything else. They are emboldening the enemy by saying this is a worthless war. In effect, their actions will only result in the loss of more of our troops.
Let's consider the Congressional hearings confirming General David Petraeus as the top American ground commander in Iraq, and Petraeus argued vehemently for the troop surge, and the Democrats all voted for him and wished him the best of luck and success in his mission. Two weeks later say the mission is a total failure and a mistake, with no planning or ultimate objectives. Imagine if you had a fighter and you know that Mike Tyson will knock him out in the first round, but you go out and hire the best trainer, and wish him "Best of Luck" and tell him where to send the body.
What success do they wish Petraeus? If they think the mission is stupid, why do they need a brilliant man? Why do they want to watch something flop successfully? Why do they need a great general at all — why do they need the best man, if he will serve no purpose? Why should a man get paid for nothing? If the Democrats approve sending him on a worthless mission, then they are complicit in planning the murder of innocent people. If they had the courage of their convictions, they would have cancelled the mission. Why approve Petraeus in the first place?
Well, I think we know why.